We normally take it for granted that other people will live on after we ourselves have died. Even if we do not believe in a personal afterlife in which we survive our own deaths, we assume that there will be a ‘collective afterlife’ in which humanity survives long after we are gone.
Samuel Scheffler (http://as.nyu.edu/faculty/samuel-scheffler.html) maintains that this assumption plays a hugely influential role in our lives. In certain important respects, the future existence of people who are as yet unborn matters more to us than our own continued existence and the continued existence of those we love.
Without the expectation that humanity has a future, many of the things that now matter to us would cease to do so. Also, the prospect of our own deaths does little to undermine our confidence in the value of our activities. Despite the terror we may feel when contemplating our deaths, then, the prospect of humanity’s imminent extinction would pose a far greater threat to our ability to lead value-laden lives – lives structured by wholehearted engagement in valued activities and pursuits.
This conclusion defeats widespread beliefs about human egoism and individualism. And it has striking implications for the way we think about climate change, nuclear proliferation, and other urgent threats to human survival. Scheffler goes on to argue the following. Personal immortality, would actually undermine our confidence in the values we hold dear. His arresting conclusion is that, in order for us to lead value-laden lives, what is necessary is that we ourselves should die and that others should live.
Scheffler’s position is discussed with insight and imagination by four distinguished commentators – Harry Frankfurt, Niko Kolodny, Seana Shiffrin, and Susan Wolf. Scheffler adds a final reply. “This is some of the most interesting and best-written philosophy I have read in a long time. Scheffler’s book is utterly original in its fundamental conception, brilliant in its analysis and argument, and concise and at times beautiful in its formulation.” Stephen Darwall, Yale University; “Scheffler’s discussion of the issues with which he has concerned himself is fresh and original. Moreover, so far as I am aware, those issues are themselves pretty much original with him. He seems really to have raised, within a rigorously philosophical context, some new questions. At least, so far as I know, no one before has attempted to deal with those questions so systematically. So it appears that he has effectively opened up a new and promising field of philosophical inquiry. Not bad going, in a discipline to which many of the very best minds have already devoted themselves for close to three thousand years.” – Harry Frankfurt, Princeton University, from ‘How the Afterlife Matters’ “; “A truly wonderful and very important book.” – Derek Parfit, Emeritus Fellow, All Souls College, University of Oxford.
======================================
Accompany this with a listen to the Radio 4
‘In Our Time’ 45 minute podcast on the subject of death in Western intellectual history. Available at the page
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00546ry The discussion features Jonathan Dollimore, Professor of English, York University; Thomas Lynch, poet, essayist, funeral director and author of
The Undertaking – Life Studies from the Dismal Trade; Marilyn Butler, Professor of English Literature and Rector of Exeter College, Oxford.
If stimulated to take a secular world view after reading Scheffler, follow up with this short selection of key works:
A shorter exercise in the assessment of the arguments is found in J.L. Mackie’s 1982 book
The Miracle of Theism. (reviewed by me here
http://sbr.lanark.co.uk/?p=2679 ) Mackie’s view is that, given the arguments and evidence, it is a miracle that theism (in any of its guises) can survive. This book has the reputation of having rattled decades of Divinity students.
For an account of the loss of faith from the Enlightenment to the twentieth century get hold of A.N. Wilson’s
God’s Funeral (reviewed by me here
http://sbr.lanark.co.uk/?p=1832)
Also recording the history of sceptical stances and the personal cost suffered by those brave enough to express them is Ludovic Kennedy in
All in the Mind: A Farewell to God. (1999,
http://www.amazon.co.uk/All-Mind-Farewell-Ludovic-Kennedy/dp/0340680636/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1455657135&sr=1-4&keywords=ludovic+kennedy) Kennedy examines the origins of gods from the earliest times, questions the reliability of both Old and New Testaments. He records the growth of European atheism from before the Reformation to the present. Interspersed with this, the author offers his often witty insights into how his own upbringing affected his thinking; and, in the final chapter, tells how he has found his own way to non-theistic spiritual fulfilment.
Sam Harris writes along similar lines in
The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason (2004,
http://www.amazon.co.uk/End-Faith-Religion-Terror-Future/dp/0393035158/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1455712992&sr=8-4) This is a stark analysis of the clash of faith and reason in today’s world. Harris offers a vivid historical tour of mankind’s willingness to suspend reason in favuor of religious beliefs, even when those beliefs are used to justify destruction and heinous crimes. He asserts that in an era of nuclear weapons we can no longer tolerate views that pit one ‘true’ ‘god’ against another. He argues that we cannot even afford moderate lip service to religion. This is a concession that only blinds us to the real perils of fundamentalism. While warning against the encroachment of organized religion into world politics, Harris also draws on new evidence from neuroscience and insights from philosophy to explore spirituality as a biological, brain-based need. He calls on us to take a secular humanistic approach to solving the problems of this world. This is the only way we can save ourselves.
For a generous parcel packed with insight, and entertainingly written, no bookshelf should be without
The Portable Atheist (ed. Christopher Hitchens, first published 2007, 528 pages)
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Portable-Atheist-Essential-Readings-Non-Believer/dp/0306816083/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1455519332&sr=8-1&keywords=portable+atheist) Includes pieces by Lucretius, Benedict de Spinoza, Charles Darwin, Karl Marx, Mark Twain, George Eliot, Bertrand Russell, Emma Goldman, H. L. Mencken, Albert Einstein, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Salman Rushdie, Ian McEwan, and Ayaan Hirsi Ali. A treasure and a pleasure one returns to time and again.
If you can shake yourself free of these ancient impulses you may not be happier but you’ll be less deceived (book reviewed by me here
http://sbr.lanark.co.uk/?p=2643) Battle the gods and win.
224 pages in Oxford University Press
First published 2013
ISBN 978-0199982509
Professor Samuel Scheffler